首页> 外文OA文献 >Differences in perceived technological problem-solving ability of university technology and humanities students
【2h】

Differences in perceived technological problem-solving ability of university technology and humanities students

机译:大学技术与人文学科学生解决技术问题的感知能力上的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Technology is one of the most dominant factors impinging on our lives. Of critical importance is that some citizens have specific knowledge of how to solve selected problems and make intelligent and informed decisions about technology. The purpose of this study was to determine if university students\u27 perspectives of their technological problem-solving skills improve as they progress through their degree programs. The study was designed to look at selected student criteria to determine the results;A Perceived Technological Problem Solving Ability Instrument (PTPSAI) was developed to address the following research questions: (1) Is there a significant difference in the perceptions of technological problem-solving ability between technologically-oriented and nontechnologically-oriented university students? (2) Is there a significant difference in technological problem-solving ability between freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors measured by mean scores on the PTPSAI? (3) Is there a significant difference in technological problem-solving ability between students with different work experiences measured by mean PTPSAI scores? (4) Is there a significant difference in mean PTPSAI scores for different amounts of prior work experience? (5) Is there a significant difference in mean PTPSAI scores for different levels of GPA?;The PTPSAI was constructed by initially developing 49 questions as face valid indicators extracted from a pool of questions posed to a panel of experts. The items were randomly arranged and given to a group of 23 students as a pilot study. Following a factor analysis on the responses, 36 items were retained. Ten demographic questions were added to address participants\u27 individual characteristics. The survey was then distributed to humanities and technology students at three universities, with a total of 430 usable instruments collected. Statistical analyses performed include factor analysis, reliability, t-tests of means, and one-way analysis of variance;Results showed a moderately high reliability of 0.81 of the PTPSAI items. Findings revealed a significant difference in the PTPSAI scores of humanities and technology students. There was a significant difference in PTPSAI scores among students with different years of work experience and for different levels of GPA. Students with higher GPAs were better problem solvers;The applicability and implementation of technological problem solving in the university setting needs to be investigated further. Future studies were recommended to include other disciplines to see if students in those areas might require a different level of insight for technological problem solving. More detailed studies should be conducted to explore the differences in perceptions of students in various disciplines. Additional research is also needed to identify the most effective method of teaching the concept of technological problem solving for educational settings. Exploratory and qualitative research methods are recommended since technological problem solving is still new in education.
机译:技术是影响我们生活的最主要因素之一。至关重要的是,一些公民对如何解决选定的问题以及就技术做出明智和明智的决定具有特定的知识。这项研究的目的是确定随着学生攻读学位课程的进展,他们对技术解决问题技能的看法是否有所提高。该研究旨在根据选定的学生标准来确定结果;开发了感知技术问题解决能力工具(PTPSAI),以解决以下研究问题:(1)技术解决问题的观念是否存在显着差异技术型和非技术型大学生之间的能力如何? (2)通过PTPSAI的平均分数衡量,新生,大二,大三和大四之间的技术解决问题能力是否存在显着差异? (3)在不同工作经历的学生之间,通过PTPSAI平均得分衡量的技术问题解决能力是否存在显着差异? (4)对于不同数量的先前工作经验,PTPSAI平均得分是否存在显着差异? (5)不同GPA水平的PTPSAI平均得分是否存在显着差异?PTPSAI是通过最初开发49个问题作为面对面有效指标而构建的,这些指标是从专家组提出的一系列问题中提取的。这些项目被随机安排并交给了23名学生作为实验研究。在对答复进行因素分析后,保留了36项。添加了十个人口统计问题,以解决参与者的个人特征。然后,该调查被分发给三所大学的人文与技术专业学生,共收集了430种可用仪器。进行的统计分析包括因素分析,信度,均值t检验和方差单向分析;结果显示PTPSAI项的信度为0.81,具有较高的信度。调查结果显示,人文与科技类学生的PTPSAI分数存在显着差异。在不同工作年限和不同GPA水平的学生中,PTPSAI分数存在显着差异。具有较高GPA的学生是更好的问题解决者;需要进一步研究大学环境中技术问题解决的适用性和实施​​情况。建议将来的研究包括其他学科,以查看这些领域的学生是否可能需要不同水平的洞察力来解决技术问题。应该进行更详细的研究,以探索不同学科的学生在观念上的差异。还需要进行其他研究,以确定最有效的方法来教授教育环境中解决技术问题的概念。由于技术问题的解决仍是教育中的新问题,因此建议采用探索性和定性研究方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jadali, Farhad;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号